Author: Hilary Webb

  • My 5 Favourite Potter en Français Translations PART 1

    My 5 Favourite Potter en Français Translations PART 1

    As promised in my mid-year resolution that I made in September, I have been reading Harry Potter in French for the first time lately. This afternoon, as I picked up Le Prisonnier d’Azkaban, I was excited, not just because it has been a pleasure to return to the wizarding world, but because some of the translations for names and places have been half of the entertainment. So far I’ve found it spooky how even though I’m reading these books for the first time in years and in a different language, seeing the chapter titles is enough to fill me with the same excited glee as ever. Gilderoy Lockhart, is still just as arrogantly and ironically maddening as he is in English.

    Apologies to anyone who doesn’t like Harry Potter but honestly, what is wrong with you? For those who don’t speak French I’ll do my best to explain why I’m tickled. Without further ado, here are my favourite French translations from Harry Potter 1 and 2 – L’école des Sorciers and La Chambre des Secrets.

    Le Choixpeau Magique

    Now of course any new student at Hogwarts (or Poudlard, I should say) must be sorted into the correct house. I’ll touch upon the title of the houses in a moment, but let’s talk about the sorting process first, shall we? The infamous Sorting Hat is translated to le Choixpeau Magique, which honestly brings me an absurd amount of joy. “Choix” meaning choice, and “chapeau” meaning hat, it is an excellent squashing together of words that I fully support. It makes “Sorting Hat” suddenly seeming extraordinarily dull, for a talking hat, that is.

    giphy

    Touffu

    Now what’s better than Hagrid having named his giant three-headed dog Fluffy? The fact that in the French version, he names it Touffu. While it pretty much just a literal translation (it sort of means “dense-y”), I think it’s extra amusing for English readers of the French version (confused yet?) because it becomes a sickly sweet name, as well as just being totally mad.

    Deauclaire, Dubois, Chouvrage & Quasi-Sans-Téte

    A couple of names I randomly enjoyed the very literal translations of were Penelope Clearwater to Penelope Deauclaire, Oliver Wood to Olivier Dubois and Professor Sprout to Proffesseur Chouvrage. Simple, exact translations that just sound even better in French. The other really great example is Nick Quasi-Sans-Tête. Any guesses? Nearly Headless Nick, of course!

    giphy (1).gif

    Poufsouffle

    Now Hogwarts isn’t Hogwarts in French, which does bother me slightly, but what is more fascinating is how some of the house names have been changed. Gryffindor becomes Gryffondor, Slytherin becomes Serpentard (both fair translations) but then Ravenclaw becomes Serdaigle and Hufflepuff becomes Poufsouffle. While they do literally translate to “claw of eagle” and “puffy puff”,  I do however get a little mad that the translator (Jean-François Ménard) doesn’t change their first names to keep the alliteration. It’s maddening to me to have Helga Poufsouffle and Rowena Serdaigle.

    Malefoy

    At first I didn’t think anything of the added “e” in Malfoy, but then I’m became suspicious that it might be a philosophy thing. I assume that Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone couldn’t be translated directly because France has such a long and complicated relationship with philosophy (Beauvoir, Satre etc.). Now I’m wondering if the same tradition has anything to do with Malfoy’s name too. “Mauvais foi” (bad faith) is an existential idea conceptualised by Beauvoir and Satre, and I’m sure I’ve read it as “mal foi” somewhere too. I may be wrong, and it could just be a pronunciation aid but I like to think it’s a little cooler than that. Malfoy’s character certainly has a little mauvais foi about him, I’m not sure the “e” is necessary…

    giphy (2).gif

    Let me know if you’ve enjoyed this blog and I’ll highlight a few more of my favourites as I continue to read the series in French. 

    Now read Part 2, featuring Padfoot, Prongs, Grindylows & more

  • Is Fertility Awareness a Teched-up Disguise of the Rhythm Method? #Periodically 16

    Is Fertility Awareness a Teched-up Disguise of the Rhythm Method? #Periodically 16

    I first heard the phrase “Rhythm Method” in a Religious Education class at my all-girls catholic high school. It was discussed alongside actual birth control methods like the pill and condoms, and I detected a tone of skepticism in the voice of my teacher. I have a vague memory of dropping the phrase at home one day and my dad going on a “it doesn’t work” rant, which ended, as I recall, with him threatening to demonstrate something involving a banana and a condom…

    So off I pottered on with my life, knowing that the Rhythm Method, which involves using the dates of your previous cycle to forecast the fertile and infertile days of the next, was an unreliable load of rubbish.

    Then something happened. I read an article by Holly Grigg-Spall that talked of Daysy and the Fertility Awareness Method. A year or so later the Natural Cycles phenomenon began. When I first heard about it my family and I agreed that it was the Rhythm Method in disguise, teched-up and glorified anew – it was a dangerous response to the sudden rejection of hormonal contraception that was going to end in a lot of unwanted pregnancies.

    That is until I learnt how the Fertility Awareness Method (FAM) was different from the Rhythm Method. While the Rhythm Method looks retrospectively at past cycle dates, FAM looks for markers of fertility within your current cycle. Tracking Basal Body Temperature (BBT) can flag up the temperature increase that occurs around ovulation. There are other markers too. Getting very familiar with your cervical fluid can be a huge indicator of fertility, testing your urine for luteinizing hormone (LH) even more so.

    I remain very nervous about how FAM is being depicted as this completed project. “Here it is, go forth and only multiply if you want to,” has been the attitude. I think it is still early days and that FAM should be treated as a step in the right direction, not a finite solution to a huge problem. So far in my own experience with FAM I’ve found that I’m less likely to take my BBT reading at the correct time than I was to take the pill on time. It is still super at risk of human error. This is before you consider the fact it can take around six years for a menstrual cycle to get, well, cyclical after menarche and without considering health conditions that can morph FAM data.

    Now a leaked memo from the White House suggests that as effective teen-pregnancy prevention programs (contraception) are being subsidised, abstinence based, sex risk and Fertility Awareness methods are being suggested as alternatives. I think that a big part of what the White House, and supporters of FAM within the Catholic Church, have got wrong, is that the sudden focus on FAM and the recent turn away from hormonal contraceptives is not because we are worried about our consciouses, souls or honour – it’s about wanting more. We want to choose when and if we do or do not have children and we want that choice to be free from the life-changing side-affects that often come with mainstream methods of hormonal birth control. FAM is still birth control. Those using it to avoid pregnancy are still looking for a contraceptive, they are simply asking for more. Having observed the changes in my own body when I was on and off of the pill(s), I am now acutely aware of how my body changes throughout my cycle. If that can stop me getting pregnant (if I could have sex, that is LOL) then of course I’m going to exploit that.

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: knowledge of self is powerful.

    This week I attended the opening of Period Piece at the Science Gallery in London. It’s on over the weekend too if you want to check it out, but it was a excellent platform for talking about why Femtech is changing things by using old ideas in new ways. Period Piece is a multi-media art piece that incorporates biometric data, like BBT, while touching upon political and religious events, like the papal ban on the pill in 1968.

  • Happy Anniversary Luke, Lorelai & AYITL

    Happy Anniversary Luke, Lorelai & AYITL

    Attention: this blog is spoilerific and won’t make much sense for those not in the know, so get in the know – there are only 153 episode and four films – you can do it! 

    Ah November, for Gilmore fans like myself it is a special month as it occupies the epitome of fall, and therefore the very best of Gilmore Girls. This November also happens to mark the one year anniversary of two very special events on the Gilmore calendar, in the world of the fans and the world of Stars Hollow. November 25 marks one year since the revival A Year in the Life was released on Netflix and November 5 marks Luke and Lorelai’s one year (wedding) anniversary (though technically it’s November 4 and it will probably always be June 3 in my mind).

    luke and loreali

    So a year on from these two highly anticipated events, that both came with their overwhelming and underwhelming moments after such a long period (NINE COLD YEARS) of anticipation, I recently re-binged from season one to revival’s Fall. After a year of frantically reading Gilmore Girls Confessions I think my processing time is over and that it’s time to offer some thoughts I have on the revival that I didn’t share at the time.

    Where Rory is at

    A lot of the criticism I’ve seen about the revival is that “it doesn’t seem realistic for Rory to have so little of her life together”. If you take the best part of the decade out of the mix and imagine the revival follows on directly from Season 7 (not ASP, I know) it makes a lot of sense. I’m still living the immediate aftermath of graduation and find Rory’s storyline super realistic. Add in the decade and while it’s perhaps a bigger stretch, I still think it works. It also happens that my path is (career-wise) following Rory’s and I’m already learning the fluctuations of freelance life. Rory’s rootless existence is actually very appealing to me. Of course it has its lows, but I think Rory is young and intelligent enough to ride them out for the highs – I hope I am too!

    Stars Hollow – The Musical

    I hated it the first time around. It was past midnight as our small Gilmore party hit Summer and I was gasping for action to keep me awake, not the most random and perverse musical ever. I immediately joined forces with those saying “ASP is trying to revive Bunheads and GG at the same time – it’s an outrage!” I’m over that now. A) ASP’s husband wrote Summer so let’s not hate her for it, B) musical theatre is incredibly present throughout all seven series. From Miss Patty and her dance recitals and one woman shows to Kirk’s performance art, from Hep Alien to the most emotional school production of Fidler on the Roof ever produced, Gilmore loves music, dance and drama. So the addition of the musical isn’t that random. The content of it is ironic and funny in true Gilmore fashion, it just runs on way too long if you ask me. However, Sutton Foster singing ‘Unbreakable‘ is one of the most tear-jerking moments of the revival, which would obviously make no sense without the musical, so I might even go as far as to say I like the musical now… sort of.

    Emily, Emily, Emily

    I have only one qualm with Emily’s plot in the revival. I loved her ending but I just wish it could have somehow still happened while Emily was at the first wedding. After all the weddings of Lorelai’s that Emily has planned for or been disappointed by, it felt kind of wrong that she wasn’t there. When it comes to Nantucket and leaving the DAR though, I am all aboard. Throughout the whole series Emily worried about whether she would have a life without Richard and I’m glad we got to see her make one.

    anigif_sub-buzz-22710-1480114527-5

    Logan

    I should probably make the disclaimer that I am and have always been team Jess. In my recent re-binge of the series Logan grew on me more than he normally does, but he is still an entitled piece of… Ahem anyway. I know it wasn’t necessarily ASP’s intentions, but I can’t help but feel in the revival Logan’s dynastic marriage plan is a result of his poor little ego having been so hurt by Rory saying no to his Season 7 proposal. He is scared she’ll say no again, so won’t let her move out of the mistress zone. Don’t get me started on him giving her a key to his spare home. Actually, let’s go into it. Professing that it’s for her to write her novel when Lorelai, if she ever found out, would agree with me that it’s like he’s trying to keep his mistress in a separate space now their London agreement has been busted. Eugh.

    Nine years is a long time to maintain a casual relationship as Logan and Rory have apparently done and I find that a little hard to believe. I struggle to grasp what Rory’s motivation would be to stay in such a ‘relationship’ for so long, but we all do stupid shit, and if the only other option is Paul then we cannot blame the woman.

    Speaking of Paul…

    Contrary to popular opinion, I love the addition (and omission) of Paul. I don’t think it’s nearly as unrealistic as people seem to think it is, it’s the kind of thing that can and does happen in my own family… whoops.

    My Top Three Revival Moments

    Carole King singing I feel the Earth Move was a highlight but not in the top three. Though while we’re on music the soundtrack was perfect, I love the Dolly Parton choice for the end of Winter and of course the Sam Phillip’s ‘Reflecting Light’ playing at the wedding was a dream for all us die-hard GG fans.

    Paris.gif

    1. Paris! I think my favourite revived character was Paris. I think Liza Weil did such an amazing job in showing Paris’ growth but keeping her spirit. From her crushing on Tristan to her career that incorporated her indecision over law or med school, the revival made me love Paris even more than I did before. I’m just gutted that they sort of just dropped the Paris/Doyle plot line half way through the revival, they opened something up but it didn’t really seem totally closed – less musical and more P/D reconciliation perhaps?
    2. Lorelai’s memory of Richard. I didn’t want to put a sad one in my top three but Lauren Graham acts her ass off so much in that phone scene in Fall that you can’t not love it. It let’s us have a little bit of Richard via a lot of Lorelai.
    3. Life and Death Brigade. I always want to hate Colin and Finn because they come with Logan, but I can’t, I love them. I really in enjoy the ‘With a Little Help from my Friends’ scene.

    I also really loved every single Luke-Jess interaction. Scott Patterson and Milo Ventimiglia are brilliant on-screen together and always have been.

    Richard

    When Rory ‘sees’ Richard in his office… oof, that hits you right in the feels, doesn’t it? Richard was always such a huge, loveable and infuriating part of the show, it’s great that his presence is still so huge after Edward Hermman’s death – I think they did him proud in how they ran the grief storyline.

    richard.gif

    Who’s the daddy?

    As much as I wish it was the Wookie (how brilliant is that scene!), Rory would be much more pregnant than she is by Fall for that to be the case. I hope there was a secret rendez-vous with Jess that we don’t know about, after all his look through the window was a lil’ impregnating.

    jess.gif

    But if we go with the full circle theory and the impromptu chat with Christopher then I guess it’s Logan. That’s a shame, but if Gilmores can’t make a triumph out of a disaster then who can?

    ASP also gave an interview after the revival where she said “by the way, Rory doesn’t have to keep the baby. There are choices here that she can make. It’s just the left turn. It’s that curveball that life throws you.” When the outrage at the final four words began I was wondering why no one was talking about the option of abortion – I do think it is something that Rory would really consider and I’d be interested to see what the fandom’s reaction would be to that plot development if there was ever a revival revival.

    I like to tell myself that Jess is the father because we’re never going to know what actually happens next, after all the final four words were always supposed to be, well, final. I read the end of Lauren Graham’s book Talking as Fast as I can and read reports that ASP is in talks with Netflix to continue reviving and I’m not sure how I feel. I think, mostly, I agree that it doesn’t really feel like an ending, but that it is.